Half of Young Adults Don’t Know Planned Parenthood Does Abortions

English: Prevention Park, is the largest Plann...

 Aborto: uma lucrativa atividade que precisa isentar médicos de  responsabilidades criminais para continuar a prosperar 

Metade dos jovens adultos nos EUA não sabem que a Planned Parenthood também faz abortos.  No Brasil, provavelmente este percentual de desconhecimento alcança a quase  100% de jovens e adultos.   A Planned Parenthood é o maior negócio abortista  do mundo  e, sempre que consegue a legalização do aborto em algum país, lá se estabelece com  clínicas particulares de aborto e obtém lucros cada vez maiores com esta prática.  O  maior interesse dela, portanto, é isentar de responsabilidades criminais os médicos que  praticarem o aborto mediante pagamento;  o que,  no Projeto do Novo Código Penal, elaborado por comissão de juristas da confiança do Governo Federal – inconstitucionalmente – está liberando em todas as hipóteses no Brasil, mediante novo artíficio jurídico. Para o público é dito que apenas foram “ampliadas” as hipóteses de aborto no Projeto do Novo Código Penal: mentira, ele já está encaminhado para aprovação no Congresso com artifícios que permitem – na prática – o aborto em qualquer hipótese.

(…) “On December 27, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) released its latest Annual Report for 2009-2010. The report indicates PPFA had a total budget of $1.04 billion and an excess of revenue over expenses of 18.5 million dollars — a net profit. The new report also revealed 46 percent of the total PPFA budget comes from taxpayer dollars in the form of government funding.” (…)

Veja:  Projeto do Novo Código Penal: aborto, desinformação e impedimentos legislativos

Celso Galli Coimbra
OABRS 11352

___

A question in a new survey Students for Life of America released last week should cause alarm for pro-life advocate working against Planned Parenthood, the nation’s biggest abortion business.

In the Students for Life nationally-commissioned poll, young, college-aged adults, were asked a variety of questions on abortion issues. One question queried, “Do you believe it is (ROTATED) mostly true or mostly false that Planned Parenthood clinics offer abortion to pregnant women?”

Alarmingly, despite the fact that Planned Parenthood does more than one-quarter of all abortions in the United States and is one of the leading worldwide abortion businesses, the plurality of respondents – 48% – said they did not know or could not judge whether Planned Parenthood clinics offered abortions to pregnant women. While half had no idea Planned Parenthood is an abortion business, 37 percent understood the true nature of the organization while another 11 percent said Planned Parenthood doesn’t do abortions.

The poll also found pro-life advocates have significantly more work to do to expose Planned Parenthood, its abuses, violations of law, botched abortions, how it misleads women and how it promotes abortions nationally and globally. The poll found 66 percent of those young adults surveyed have a favorable view of Planned Parenthood while 11 percent have an unfavorable view, 14 percent are unsure and three percent had never heard of the abortion giant.

“Respondents’ favorability towards Planned Parenthood was a strong indicator of whether they believed the organization to be an abortion provider. Those who were unfavorable toward Planned Parenthood were much more likely than its supporters to know about their abortion offerings (69%-40%),” the SFLA poll indicated. “However, respondents that identified as pro-choice on both the 2-point and 6-point scales were more inclined than pro-lifers to know about Planned Parenthood’s abortion offerings (45% vs. 40%, 2 pt.; 48% vs. 32%, 6pt). This demonstrates a messaging opportunity to pro-life and conservative young adults, as well as those who straddle the fence on the issue.”

The most recent annual report from Planned Parenthood showed it helped fewer pregnant women with prenatal care and the number of pregnant women it referred for adoptions declined as well.

On December 27, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) released its latest Annual Report for 2009-2010. The report indicates PPFA had a total budget of $1.04 billion and an excess of revenue over expenses of 18.5 million dollars — a net profit. The new report also revealed 46 percent of the total PPFA budget comes from taxpayer dollars in the form of government funding.

The report also broke down the “services” Planned Parenthood offers in addition to abortions. Planned Parenthood has always come under fire from pro-life groups for doing hundreds of thousands of abortions but providing little in the way of help for pregnant women wanting to keep their baby or considering adoption. The new report showed that hasn’t changed.

The document the abortion organization posted shows Planned Parenthood did 329,445 abortions in 2010 while it provided prenatal care to only 31,098 women and referred only 841 women to adoption agencies.

The number of women receiving prenatal care dropped significantly from 2009 to 2010, as the abortion business helped 40,489 women in 2009 — meaning almost 10,000 fewer women received prenatal support from Planned Parenthood last year than the year prior, or a drop of almost 25 percent. The number of women getting adoption referrals also declined — from a low 977 in 2009 to 841 last year, or a decline of 14 percent.

Examined another way Planned Parenthood does 391 abortions for every adoption referral it makes and almost 11 abortions for every woman it helps with prenatal care.

The trend at Planned Parenthood has been for its non-abortion services for pregnant women to decline while its number of abortions performed has increased. The 2009 annual report Planned Parenthood released earlier this year showed a 25 percent drop in prenatal care clients and a whopping 59 percent decline in adoption referrals from the 2,405 adoption referrals in 2008.

Planned Parenthood’s own records now show 5,364,540 surgical and medical abortions done at Planned Parenthood centers from 1970 through the end of 2009.

Fonte:  http://www.lifenews.com/2012/06/25/half-of-young-adults-dont-know-planned-parenthood-does-abortions/

__

John Lennon não concordou com aborto

__

Yoko Ono admitiu que estava disposta a abortar quando ficou grávida do ex-beatle John Lennon, mas deixou que a decisão final fosse tomada pelo músico, segundo revelou ao programa Desert Island Discs, da BBC Radio 4.
Pelo fato de atravessarem uma relação turbulenta, Yoko admitiu que não tinha certeza se queria ter o bebê, nascido em 1975 e que recebeu o nome Sean, porque não sabia se John Lennon o queria, informou a agência EFE.

 

A viúva de Lennon, que agora tem 74 anos, começou sua relação com o ex-beatle em 1967 e dois anos depois estavam casados, mas Sean foi concebido após uma separação de 18 meses.

 

– Sei que soa estranho agora, mas eu pensei e percebi que deveria deixar que John decidisse se queria tê-lo ou não. Depois de ficarmos juntos outra vez, fiquei grávida em seguida, e não sabia se era o momento certo para ter uma criança, porque talvez ele não quisesse. Não o queria incomodar com algo que não quisesse – acrescentou.

Yoko afirmou que Lennon, que foi assassinado em Nova York, em dezembro de 1980, disse que queria ter a criança.

O jornal Sunday Times lembra que Lennon dedicou seu tempo para criar seu filho e deixou a música de lado por vários anos.

Domingo, 10 de junho de 2007
Yoko Ono cogitou abortar Sean Lennon
http://www.clicrbs.com.br/clicnoticias/jsp/default.jsp?source=DYNAMIC,blog.BlogDataServer,getBlog&pg=1&uf=1&local=1&template=3025.dwt&tp=&blog=53&tipo=1&coldir=1&post=21154
__

Mulheres que abortam têm mais chances de ter problema mental

__

Estudo concluiu que o aborto pode aumentar em 155% as chances de a mulher cometer suicídio
Foto: Getty Images

Mulheres que fazem abortos têm quase o dobro de risco de desenvolver problemas mentais em comparação com as demais pessoas, segundo estudo. A pesquisa descobriu que o aborto afeta a saúde mental e pode causar ansiedade, depressão, alcoolismo, abuso de drogas e suicídio.   As informações são do Daily Mail.

 

 

O estudo foi baseado em uma análise de 22 projetos separados que avaliaram as experiências de 877 mil mulheres, das quais 163,831 tinham abortado. Os resultados apontaram que mulheres que se submeteram ao aborto tiveram um risco 81% maior de problemas de saúde mental e quase 10% das doenças mentais mostraram ligação direta com o ato.

A pesquisa concluiu que o aborto estava relacionado a 34% de aumento de chances de transtornos de ansiedade, 37% de depressão, 110% de aumento de risco do abuso do álcool, 220% do uso de maconha e 155% mais chances de suicídio.

Fonte: http://saude.terra.com.br/noticias/0,,OI5324985-EI1497,00-Mulheres+que+abortam+tem+mais+chances+de+ter+problema+mental.html
__

Abortion, Contraception Legislative Battles Escalate In States

Nos EUA há uma forte tendência legislativa para limitar o aborto, conforme pode ser lido no noticiário daquele país. No Brasil, o seu governo eleito com o compromisso de não promover o aborto, está novamente IMPONDO o aborto a seu povo, que em sua grande maioria é contra esta prática. Democracia?
__

Mar 21, 2012

All across the country, state legislatures and governors are grappling with bills designed to limit access to abortion or contraception. In Virginia, it’s affecting a U.S. Senate race.

Bloomberg: Contraception Fight Shapes Virginia Race For U.S. Senate

Former U.S. Senator George Allen, a Virginia Republican who is running to return to the chamber, backs the “personhood” measure and would like to make it federal law. … The race between Allen and Democrat Tim Kaine is among the most watched in the country, pitting two former Virginia governors in a contest for an open seat with majority control of the U.S. Senate at stake. Democrats see proposals to curb reproductive rights as a way to drive female independent voters back to the party in the November election (Przybyla, 3/20).

Reuters: Utah Governor Signs Law Mandating 72-Hour Wait For Abortion

Utah’s Republican governor signed a law extending a required waiting period for women seeking an abortion to 72 hours on Tuesday, even though a similar requirement in South Dakota has been blocked in court, a spokeswoman said. … The state currently requires a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion (Dobuzinskis, 3/20).

The Associated Press: Idaho Lawmaker Sparks Anger With Abortion Comments

A Republican Idaho lawmaker’s suggestion on the Senate floor that a doctor should ask a woman who says she was raped if the pregnancy could have been “caused by normal relations in a marriage” brought a rebuke from another legislator who said it’s insensitive and suggests women may lie to get an abortion. Sen. Chuck Winder of Boise, the Senate assistant majority leader, was speaking during closing testimony on a bill to require a woman to get an ultrasound before an abortion, when he addressed foes of the legislation who said it provided no exemptions for medical emergencies — or in cases of rape or incest (Miller, 3/20).

The Associated Press/(St. Paul) Pioneer Press: Medical Group Asks Walker To Veto Wisconsin Abortion Bill
Wisconsin’s largest medical association asked Gov. Scott Walker on Tuesday, March 20, to veto a bill that would add new requirements for doctors to ensure a woman isn’t forced into an abortion. Walker’s office said the governor is evaluating the bill. The Wisconsin Medical Society’s letter said the bill passed by the Republican-controlled state Legislature this month would infringe on the physician-patient relationship (Rodriguez, 3/20).

Arizona Republic: Arizona Lawmaker Wants To Go Further On Abortion Laws

Arizona has become the national epicenter in recent weeks in the battle over abortion and contraception regulations. … at least one lawmaker doesn’t believe Arizona has yet gone far enough. … The e-mail [from Rep. Terri Proud], which has not been edited, said: “Personally I’d like to make a law that mandates a woman watch an abortion being performed prior to having a ‘surgical procedure'” (Rau, 3/20).

The Associated Press/The Seattle Times: Lawmakers Vow to Push Abortion Insurance Bill

Democratic lawmakers said Tuesday that they will try to pass a bill during the current special session requiring insurers who cover maternity care — which Washington insurers are mandated to provide — to also pay for abortions. The measure passed out of the House during the legislative session that ended March 8 but failed in the Senate after a dramatic attempt to bring it to the floor during a Republican budget coup (Kaminsky, 3/20).

The Dallas Morning News: Women Get Into Perry’s Facebook

Rick Perry’s presidential campaign Facebook page … has been inundated by angry women who are making pointed comments regarding his efforts to defund Planned Parenthood. A woman who identifies herself as a gynecologist is referring questions to him, since (I am sure this is sarcastic) he knows more about reproductive health than she does (Hoppe, 3/20).

This is part of Kaiser Health News’ Daily Report – a summary of health policy coverage from more than 300 news organizations. The full summary of the day’s news can be found here and you can sign up for e-mail subscriptions to the Daily Report here. In addition, our staff of reporters and correspondents file original stories each day, which you can find on our home page.

Fonte: http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/daily-reports/2012/march/21/states-abortion-contraception.aspx
__

19 Facts About Abortion In America That Should Make You Very Sick

__

The American Dream
February 11, 2012

Every single day, a silent horror kills more Americans than were killed on 9/11. Every single year, this silent horror kills about as many Americans as have been killed on all the battlefields in all of the wars in U.S. history combined. This silent horror is called abortion, and it is a national disgrace. Overall, more than 50 million babies have been slaughtered since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973. We have become a nation with so little regard for human life that nobody even really talks that much about this issue anymore. But the truth is that it is at the very core of what is wrong with America. As I have written about previously, we have become a nation that is obsessed with population control, and we have been exporting this sick philosophy all over the globe. As you read this, there are workers from U.S. organizations and UN organizations (both funded by your tax dollars) that are on the other side of the world setting up “family planning services” for women in poor countries. The goal of these organizations (just like we see in the United States) is to reduce the number of poor children being born. The sick control freaks that run things have decided that overpopulation is a plague that must be eradicated and that mass murder is the answer. Unfortunately, there are very few people that are still willing to speak out strongly against abortion in America. So the carnage is just going to go on and on and on.

What will the history books say about a nation that murdered 50 million of its own babies?

The following are 19 facts about abortion in America that should make you very sick….

1 – There have been more than 53 million abortions performed in the United States since Roe v. Wade was decided back in 1973.

2 – When you total up all forms of abortion, including those caused by the abortion drug RU 486, the grand total comes to more than a million abortions performed in the United States every single year.

3 – The number of American babies killed by abortion each year is roughly equal to the number of U.S. military deaths that have occurred in all of the wars that the United States has ever been involved in combined.

4 – Approximately 3,000 Americans lost their lives as a result of the destruction of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11. Every single day, more than 3,000 American babies are killed by abortion.

5 – It has been reported that a staggering 41 percent of all New York City pregnancies end in abortion.

6 – According to Pastor Clenard Childress, approximately 52 percent of all African-American pregnancies now end in abortion.

7One very shocking study found that 86 percent of all abortions are done for the sake of convenience.

8 – According to the Guttmacher Institute, the average cost of a first trimester abortion at the ten week mark is $451.

9 – The average cost of a vaginal birth with no complications in the United Statesis now over $9,000.

10 – A Department of Homeland Security report that was released in January 2012 says that if you are “anti-abortion”, you are a potential terrorist. Unfortunately, there have also been other government reports that have also identified “anti-abortion” protesters as potential threats.

11 – A while back one Philadelphia abortionist was charged with killing seven babies that were born alive, but witnesses claim that he actually slaughtered hundreds “of living, breathing newborn children by severing their spinal cords or slitting their necks.”

12 – Some abortion clinics have been caught selling aborted baby parts to medical researchers.

13 – Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger once said the following….

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

14 – In a 1922 book entitled “Woman, Morality, and Birth Control”, Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger wrote the following….

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”

15 – Planned Parenthood performs more than 300,000 abortions every single year.

16 – Planned Parenthood specifically targets the poor. A staggering 72 percentof Planned Parenthood’s “customers” have incomes that are either equal to or beneath 150 percent of the federal poverty level.

17 – There are 30 Planned Parenthood executives that make more than $200,000 a year. A few of them make more than $300,000 a year.

18 – Planned Parenthood received more than 487 million dollars from the federal government during 2010.

19 – The following is one description of the five steps of a partial birth abortion….

1) Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby’s legs with forceps.

2) The baby’s leg is pulled out into the birth canal.

3) The abortionist delivers the baby’s entire body, except for the head.

4) The abortionist jams scissors into the baby’s skull. The scissors are then opened to enlarge the skull.

5) The scissors are removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child’s brains are sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then removed.

How can we murder our own children?

Unfortunately, there are organizations out there such as Planned Parenthood that spend millions upon millions of dollars trying to convince the American people that abortion is okay. Just check out this jaw dropping propaganda video.

And every single year, politicians from both political parties continue to vote to give hundreds of millions of our tax dollars to Planned Parenthood.

Our politicians talk about how we need to spread our values to the rest of the world, but what kind of “values” do we really have when we have such little respect for human life?

There is no hope for America as long as this mass slaughter of innocent children continues to go on all across the United States.

Please share this list of facts about abortion in America with as many people as you can. We need to wake the American people up. Most Americans spend their days in an entertainment-induced haze and take very little time to think about the issues that really matter.

And if you think that the issue of abortion does not matter, then you are dead wrong.

The mass murder of more than 50 million American babies is something that cannot be ignored.

Their blood is crying out to us from the ground where it has been spilled.

Yes, this article is going to make a lot of people uncomfortable, but it is the truth.

Isn’t it time that someone started telling the truth in America?

Fonte: http://www.infowars.com/19-facts-about-abortion-in-america-that-should-make-you-very-sick/

Criado centro para reconhecer pais

__

A história de 43.627 estudantes de escolas públicas de Belo Horizonte sem o nome do pai no registro civil pode ser mudada. Essa realidade, apontada pelo censo escolar de 2009, e a necessidade de reunir num mesmo local todos os envolvidos no processo de averiguação de paternidade levaram o Tribunal de Justiça de Minas Gerais (TJMG) a inaugurar o Centro de Reconhecimento de Paternidade.

As mães dessas crianças serão convidadas pelo TJMG, por carta, a comparecer ao novo local para que indiquem o possível pai da criança. Se for preciso, exames de DNA serão realizados, gratuitamente. Isso é possível devido ao convênio assinado pelo TJMG e pela Secretaria de Estado de Saúde (SES), o que possibilitou, já em 2009, o lançamento do programa Pai Presente.

O 2º vice-presidente do TJMG e superintendente da Escola Judicial Desembargador Edésio Fernandes (Ejef), desembargador Joaquim Herculano Rodrigues, representando o presidente do TJMG, desembargador Cláudio Costa, disse que “realmente as estatísticas são reveladoras e reivindicam políticas públicas efetivas. O reconhecimento é o primeiro passo para que ocorram todas as outras transformações: a paternidade e a maternidade responsáveis”. A ministra do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) e corregedora-nacional de Justiça, Eliana Calmon, concorda. “Esse trabalho não se refere a uma função jurisdicional, mas o Judiciário deve se incumbir das políticas públicas. O Poder Judiciário tem de se envolver nas ações sociais, que são de importância fundamental. Esse trabalho é um reconhecimento da cidadania.”

A ministra afirmou ainda que “a Corregedoria, ao lado da função disciplinar, deve orientar a magistratura sobre como realizar políticas públicas que estão a seu alcance e sob sua responsabilidade”.

O juiz da Vara de Registros Públicos, Fernando Humberto dos Santos, vai ficar à frente do centro. Segundo ele, “um grupo de pessoas qualificadas atuará permanentemente até esgotar todos os esforços para resolver o maior número possível de casos”. Ele explica que “todos aqueles cujo pretenso pai se negue a comparecer ou reconhecer ou fazer exame de DNA, apesar das evidências de paternidade, serão encaminhados ao Ministério Público ou à Defensoria Pública para que promovam a ação de investigação”.

Referindo-se ao tempo de escravidão, o 2º vice-presidente disse que o assunto “deixou de ser algo do fundo da cozinha, de cochichos, para se tornar tema de debate público, pauta dos jornais e, até mesmo, das pregações religiosas. A ciência também deu sua contribuição com o exame de DNA”.

História

Com o centro, o TJMG passa a atender ao Provimento 12/2010 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, além de aplicar o que já está previsto na Lei 8.560/92, segundo a qual a mãe, ao registrar a criança, deve declarar o nome do provável pai para que ele seja intimado e, sendo o caso, reconheça o filho perante o juiz.

O 2º vice-presidente disse ainda que não se pode admitir que as pessoas deixem de assumir as consequências de seus atos, “desamparando seres inocente e em formação”. Ele acredita que “sempre há muito a ser aprimorado, mas é inegável que o reconhecimento do direito da criança e do dever do pai é fato importante para o desenvolvimento humano e social”.

Presença

A solenidade contou ainda com a presença do corregedor-geral de Justiça de Minas Gerais, desembargador Alvim Soares; do procurador-geral de Justiça, Alceu José Torres Marques; do juiz coronel PM James Ferreira Santos, representando o presidente do Tribunal de Justiça Militar de Minas Gerais, juiz Jadir Silva.

Também estavam presentes o coordenador do Programa Novos Rumos e membro do Conselho de Defesa do Estado, desembargador Joaquim Alves de Andrade; a coordenadora do Programa Novos Rumos e presidente do Grupo de Monitoramento e Fiscalização do Sistema Carcerário em Minas Gerais, desembargadora Jane Silva; o ex-presidente do TJMG e presidente do Conselho de Supervisão e Gestão dos Juizados Especiais, desembargador José Fernandes Filho; o juiz auxiliar da Corregedoria Nacional de Justiça, Nicolau Lupianhes Neto; e os desembargadores Herbert Carneiro, Reynaldo Portanova e Marcelo Rodrigues.

Funcionamento

O Centro de Reconhecimento de Paternidade vai funcionar de segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 18h, na avenida Olegário Maciel, 600, Barro Preto, Belo Horizonte.

Fonte: TJMG

__

Amenazan a Costa Rica por proteger los derechos del embrión

__

“la presión internacional sobre Costa Rica evidencia un deseo de convertir a ese país en un paraíso para FIV baratas, ya que se trata de un procedimiento costoso en los países desarrollados.”

Observação: a Comissão Interamericana de Direitos Humanos NÃO possui poderes jurisdicionais, é órgão consultivo, que também emite os relatórios para a Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos, esta sim, com poderes jurisdicionais exclusivamente sobre as questões relativas à Convenção Americana de Direitos Humanos, também conhecida como Pacto de São José da Costa Rica, e poderes estes apenas diante dos países que, não somente subscreveram esta Convenção, mas também aceitaram sua jurisdição por procedimentos próprios internos segundo determinado por legislação interna. O Brasil enquadra-se atualmente entre os subscritores e com aceitação de jurisdição.

__

27/04/2011

Terrence McKeegan, J.D. Tyler Ament

WASHINGTON, 22 de abril 2011 (C-FAM) – Costa Rica debe legalizar la fertilización in vitro, según la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, o de lo contrario será sancionada a causa de supuestas violaciones a derechos humanos amparados por la legislación internacional.

En 2000, el Tribunal Constitucional de Costa Rica determinó que la FIV era inconstitucional, porque violaba el derecho a la vida del embrión. Cuatro años más tarde, el Centro de Derechos Reproductivos solicitó a la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos que aceptara un caso aduciendo que esta prohibición violaba los derechos humanos de dos parejas costarricenses.

La Comisión aceptó el caso el pasado otoño boreal y pidió al gobierno de Costa Rica que legalizara la FIV, lo cual, según sostiene la Comisión, es necesario para acatar la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos (CADH).

Según pasajes del informe de la Comisión obtenidos por la prensa costarricense, esta entidad resolvió que la prohibición de la FIV por parte del gobierno invade la privacidad de las familias y el derecho a “fundar una familia acorde con sus propios deseos y aspiraciones”.

El informe censura a Costa Rica por ser el único país de las Américas que prohíbe la FIV, y sostiene que el propósito del gobierno de proteger la vida humana dio lugar a restricciones que son demasiado “severas”.

El gobierno de Costa Rica argumentó ante la Comisión que el Artículo 4 de la CADH justificaría la prohibición de la FIV, ya que establece que el derecho a la vida de cada persona “estará protegido por la ley y, en general, a partir del momento de la concepción”. La Constitución costarricense lleva este principio más allá y dice que “la vida humana es inviolable”. Además, el Código Civil de este país protege la vida desde “300 días antes de su nacimiento”.

Si bien en un principio Costa Rica defendió la prohibición, el país ahora ha presentado un proyecto de ley para legalizar la FIV, pero bajo serias restricciones. Este proyecto limita a seis el número de embriones que pueden generarse y exige que se implanten todos los embriones producidos. Esto no agradó al Centro de Derechos Reproductivos. El gobierno de Costa Rica no avanzó más con el proyecto de ley y solicitó a la Comisión que extendiera el plazo hasta el 31 de mayo.

Martha de Casco, ex Viceministra de Relaciones Exteriores de Honduras, dijo que la FIV es “es básicamente un negocio que se aprovecha de quienes creen que se puede lograr una cosa buena, como es un hijo, no importa de qué manera”. También afirmó que la presión internacional sobre Costa Rica evidencia un deseo de convertir a ese país en un paraíso para FIV baratas, ya que se trata de un procedimiento costoso en los países desarrollados.

A pesar de que muchos relatos indican que el informe de la Comisión exige a Costa Rica que modifique sus leyes, se trata de un órgano consultor cuyas recomendaciones no son vinculantes para los estados. Si un estado no atiende una recomendación de la Comisión, esta tiene la opción de elevar el caso a la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, que se encarga de interpretar y asegurar el cumplimiento de la CADH.

http://notifam.net/index.php/archives/4055/

Traducido por Luciana María Palazzo de Castellano

__

%d blogueiros gostam disto: